Brief amici curiae of Crow Tribe of Indians, National Congress of American Indians and Other Tribal Organizations filed. Brief of respondent Joshua James Cooley in opposition filed. In answering this question, our decision in Montana v. United States, Such threats may be posed by, for instance, non-Indian drunk drivers, transporters of contraband, or other criminal offenders operating on roads within the boundaries of a tribal reservation. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. The District Court then granted Cooleys motion to suppress the drug evidence and the United States appealed the decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Distributed). (Corrected brief submitted - March 22, 2021), Brief amicus curiae of Citizens Equal Rights Foundation filed. ), Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Through Savannas Act and the Not Invisible Act, both signed into law in 2019, Congress reaffirmed its commitment to empowering Tribes to better protect their communities on Tribal lands and throughout Indian country jurisdiction. (b)Cooleys arguments against recognition of inherent tribal sovereignty here are unpersuasive. (Distributed). In the wee hours of February 26, 2016, a police officer saw a pickup truck with out-of-state plates idling on the side on a remote stretch of highway. 520 U.S. 438, 456459 (1997), we relied upon Montanas general jurisdiction-limiting principle to hold that tribal courts did not retain inherent authority to adjudicate personal-injury actions against nonmembers of the tribe based upon automobile accidents that took place on public rights-of-way running through a reservation. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Joshua Cooley, 33 Resides in Houston, TX Lived In Spring TX Related To Ashley Cooley, Benjamin Cooley, Jozelle Cooley, Thomas Cooley Also known as Josh Cooley, Cooley Josh Includes Address (2) Phone (1) Email (1) See Results Joshua Blake Cooley, 37 Resides in Colorado Springs, CO Lived In Lubbock TX Related To Nathanael Cooley Justices heard about a police officer stop on the Crow Reservation in Montana, where a non-Indian was found with drugs and was charged with . Because Congress has specified the scope of tribal police activity through these statutes, Cooley argues, the Court must not interpret tribal sovereignty to fill any remaining gaps in policing authority. v. 1:16-cr-00042- SPW-1 JOSHUA JAMES COOLEY, Defendant-Appellee. DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020. Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent GRANTED, and Eric R. Henkel, Esquire, of Missoula, Montana, is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case. Join Facebook to connect with Joshua Cooley and others you may know. Main Document Proof of Service. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. 19-1414, on March 23, 2021. Elijah Cooley. 450 U.S. 544, 566 (1981); see also Strate v. A1 Contractors, ABOUT SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, March 23, 2021. In addition, the Court sees nothing in existing federal cross-deputization statutes that suggests Congress has sought to deny tribes the authority at issue. If left untouched, the brief argued, the Ninth Circuit standard would be nearly impossible to implement consistently and would serve only to incentivize criminals to lie about their identity. RESOURCES Reply of petitioner United States filed. Pp. JOSHUA JAMES COOLEY, Respondent, On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the . DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020. Brief amici curiae of Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, et al. Indian tribes may, for example, determine tribal membership, regulate domestic affairs among tribal members, and exclude others from entering tribal land. After communicating with Cooley, Officer Saylor detained him and conducted a search of the truck. In doing so we have reserved a tribes inherent sovereign authority to engage in policing of the kind before us. SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, March 23, 2021. Ibid. Ancillary to the authority to transport a non-Indian suspect is the authority to search that individual prior to transport, as several state courts and other federal courts have held. Affirmation of inherent tribal power to police blurs civil and criminal Indian law tests, Court unanimously holds that Indian tribes retain the inherent power to police non-Indians, Court struggles with the indefensible morass its made in Indian law, Tribal police drag messy Indian sovereignty cases back to the court, Justices announce low-key March argument session, Court shelves oral argument in dispute over Mueller materials, grants two new cases, Petitions of the week: Political donations, gun rights, the emoluments clause and more, Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. Brief amici curiae of Current and Former Members of Congress filed. See Oliphant v. Suquamish Tribe, Joshua James Cooley was parked in his pickup truck on the side of a road within the Crow Reservation in Montana when Officer James Saylor of the Crow Tribe approached his truck in the early hours of the morning. Joshua James Cooley Case Number: 17-30022 Judge: Berzon Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on appeal from the District of Montana (Missoula County) Plaintiff's Attorney: Leif M. Johnson Defendant's Attorney: Eric Ryan Henkel Description: None of these facts are particularly unusual or complex on their own. Brief of respondent Joshua James Cooley in opposition filed. View Joshua Reese Cooley results including current phone number, address, relatives, background check report, and property record with Whitepages. Two lower courts ruled that a tribal officer cannot detain a non-Indian on a federal roadway unless it is apparent at the time of the detention that the non-Indian has been violating state or federal law. Brief amici curiae of National Congress of American Indians and Other Tribal Organizations filed. NIWRCs work to eliminate domestic violence against Native women and children is directly implicated by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision eliminating the authority of tribal law enforcement to conduct a reasonable suspicion Terry stop on a non-Indian traveling within reservation borders. DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020. the health or welfare of the tribe. Montana v. United States, Brief amici curiae of Crow Tribe of Indians, National Congress of American Indians and Other Tribal Organizations filed. Emailus. Cooleys reply brief notes the respondents problem with that approach [emphasis in original]: [T]he government is misinterpreting Duro and Strate by inserting words that do not exist. The Government appealed. 0 Add Rating Anonymously. Feigin said the tribes authority to detain comes from the inherent sovereign authority that Indian tribes had before they were incorporated into the United States and which they never lost. The government attorney added that this authority is not granted by the Constitution or Congress but that it is recognized by both of those sources and admitted that were not looking at some specific provision.. Photos. Worcester v. Georgia, 6 Pet. In addition, recognizing a tribal officers authority to investigate potential violations of state or federal laws that apply to non-Indians whether outside a reservation or on a public right-of-way within the reservation protects public safety without implicating the concerns about applying tribal laws to non-Indians noted in the Courts prior cases. Waiver of right of respondent Joshua James Cooley to respond filed. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. (Corrected brief submitted - March 22, 2021), Brief amicus curiae of Citizens Equal Rights Foundation filed. Tribal police officers have authority to detain temporarily and to search non-Indian persons traveling on public rights-of-way running through a reservation for potential violations of state or federal law; they are not required to first determine whether a suspect is non-Indian and, if so, to temporarily detain a non-Indian only for apparent legal violations. Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021. Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 24, 2020 to August 24, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. App. Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. 153, 155159, 967 P.2d 503, 504506 (1998); State v. Ryder, 98 N.M. 453, 456, 649 P.2d 756, 759 (1982); see also United States v. Terry, 400 F.3d 575, 579580 (CA8 2005); Ortiz-Barraza, 512 F.2d, at 11801181; see generally F. Cohen, Handbook of Federal Indian Law 9.07, p. 773 (2012). The authority to search a non-Indian prior to transport is ancillary to this authority that we have already recognized. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. Brief amici curiae of Cayuga Nation, et al. Waiver of the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed. The United States filed a petition to have the Ninth Circuit panels probable-cause-plus opinion reheard en banc (before the full circuit court as opposed to a three-judge panel). View More. And they are also underinclusive. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer. (Response due July 24, 2020). And we hold the tribal officer possesses the authority at issue. The Court identified in Montana two exceptions to that general rule, the second of which fits almost like a glove here: A tribe retains inherent authority over the conduct of non-Indians on the reservation when that conduct threatens or has some direct effect on . (Response due July 24, 2020). Brief for United States 2425. 3006A(d)(7), Respondent Joshua James Cooley requests leave to file the accompanying Brief in Opposition without prepayment of costs and to proceed in forma pauperis. Cooley, a case that occurs both literally and figuratively at the intersection of American and tribal law. 37. filed. The search and detention, we assume, took place based on a potential violation of state or federal law prior to the suspects transport to the proper nontribal authorities for prosecution. DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020. Fearing violence, Saylor ordered Cooley out of the truck and conducted a patdown search. Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 24, 2020. Reply of petitioner United States filed. Instead, [the Supreme Court] at most recognized a narrow circumstance in which a tribal officer possesses a limited authority to detain non-Indian offenders and transport them to the custody of state or federal authorities. Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Breyer on June 1, 2021. Indeed, several state courts and other federal courts have held that tribal officers possess the authority at issue here. Even though Congress recognized in VAWA 2013 that the Tribal police of a VAWA-implementing Tribe have full authority to arrest non-Indians who commit domestic violence crimes on a reservation, the Ninth Circuit standard in Cooley would leave an open-ended question as to whether Tribal police would have to ascertain the suspects Indian status before effectuating a Terry stop, even if they had reasonable suspicion that the suspect committed a crime of domestic violence. Argued. Facebook gives people the power to. The officer stopped to see if assistance was needed, but the truck had heavily tinted windows and the driver did not respond clearly. Brief amici curiae of Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, et al. DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020. 0 Reputation Score Range. filed. You already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters. to Pet. Henkel eventually said the first question to answer in each scenario should be whether or not the would-be detained person is subject to tribal authority. See, e.g., Plains Commerce Bank, 554 U.S., at 328330; Nevada v. Hicks, (Distributed), Brief amicus curiae of Citizens Equal Rights Foundation filed. Brief of respondent Joshua James Cooley in opposition filed. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit agreed with the District Court and adopted the same confined view of Tribal sovereignty, holding that it is beyond the authority of a Tribal officer on a public right of way crossing a reservation to detain a non-Indian without first attempting to ascertain his status as an Indian or non-Indian. Cooley had challenged the authority of Tribal law enforcement to stop and detain non-Indians suspected of committing crimes within the borders of a reservation. Conversely, defense attorney Eric R. Henkel(we will refer to him as Henkel or the respondents attorney from here) said the officer was enforcing non-tribal laws that had nothing to do with a tribal interest and argued that the Crow tribe exceeded its authority.. Brief of respondent Joshua James Cooley filed. Saylor took Cooley to the Crow Police Department where federal and local officers further questioned Cooley. Notably, the family of Kaysera Stops Pretty Places, an 18-year-old Crow citizen murdered in Big Horn County, Montana in August of 2019, also signed onto the NIWRCs brief. It was Feb. 26, 2016 on Highway 212, where Indian Highway Safety Officer James Saylor arrested Joshua Cooley after finding several guns and 356 grams of methamphetamine inside his vehicle. Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. 532 U.S. 645, 651. (Distributed). Non-Indian status, the panel added, can usually be determined by ask[ing] one question. Ibid. 532 U.S. 645, 651 (2001), there confirming that Strate did not question the ability of tribal police to patrol the highway.. We set forth two important exceptions. UNITED STATES, PETITIONER v. JOSHUA JAMES COOLEY, on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. The other officers, including an officer with the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs, then arrived. Supreme Court Case No . Argued. Or must the officer wait until the Native woman suffers a more serious injury, such as a stab wound or broken leg, or a homicide before the commission of the crime becomes sufficiently obvious? Pursuant to Rule 39 and 18 U.S.C. As the Solicitor General points out, an initial investigation of non-Indians violations of federal and state laws to which those non-Indians are indisputably subject protects the public without raising similar concerns of the sort raised in our cases limiting tribal authority. StrongHearts Native Helpline However, the where andthe who are of profound import. View Joshua G Cooley results including current phone number, address, relatives, background check report, and property record with Whitepages. The Supreme Court expressed doubts about the workability of the Ninth Circuits ruling, noting that requiring Tribal police to ask suspects a threshold question regarding whether they were Indian would produce an incentive to lie. Further, the Court found the apparent violation standard would introduce a wholly new standard into search and seizure law with no guidance as to how the standard would be met. NativeLove, Request Technical Assistance . Brief amici curiae of Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, et al. Main Document: Oct 28 2020 Instead, Justice Breyers opinion went further, and re-affirmed the constitutional authority of Congress to restore the Tribal jurisdiction that Oliphant previously erased, once again concluding that [i]n all cases, tribal authority remains subject to the plenary authority of Congress. At a time when NIWRC and so many others are working hard to get a bipartisan VAWA through the Senate, it is highly significant that the Supreme Court, once again, has confirmed Congresss constitutional authority to restore Tribal jurisdiction over non-Indian defendants. The Crow Nation led dozens of Tribal amici curiae in support of the United States petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court. Argued. In issuing a standard which would force Tribal law enforcement to wait until domestic violence became apparent or obvious to execute a search, the Ninth Circuits decision threatened the lives of Native women. As the NIWRC pointed out, the very highway where Crow police stopped James Cooley runs through Big Horn County, where cases of 32 and counting missing or murdered Native women or girls have occurred, making Big Horn County one of the counties with the highest rates of homicide of Native women and girls in Montana, and among the highest nationwide. Before we get into what the justices said on Tuesday, here's some background on the case. The NIWRC argued the apparent and obvious requirement of probable-cause-plus was ungrounded in any state or federal legal doctrine and not taught to law enforcement at training academies. The NIWRC filed an amicus brief in support of the United States as part of its VAWA Sovereignty Initiative, arguing that if the Ninth Circuits decision was allowed to stand, it would significantly impair the ability of Tribal law enforcement to address domestic violence crimes perpetrated by non-Indians in Tribal communities, and ultimately if left unturned, the Ninth Circuits decision would only exacerbate the crisis of Murdered and Missing Indigenous Women and Girls (MMIWG). 1.06 2.93 /5. Several Ninth Circuit judges issued a dissenting opinion to this decision, stating that the panels extraordinary decision in this case directly contravenes long-established Ninth Circuit and Supreme Court precedent, disregards contrary authority from other state and federal appellate courts and threatens to seriously undermine the ability of Indian Tribes to ensure public safety for the hundreds of thousands of persons who live on reservations within the Ninth Circuit.. Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021. For petitioner: Eric J. Feigin, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Eric R. Henkel, Missoula, Mont. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Joshua James Cooley. View More. Brief amici curiae of The Ninth Circuit Federal Public and Community Defenders filed. According to the new standard now articulated by the Ninth Circuit, until or unless tribal law enforcement witness an obvious or apparent violation of state or federal law, tribal law enforcement remains without the requisite authority to briefly stop and conduct a limited investigation of a non-Indian when there is reasonable suspicion they have committed a crime. VAWA Sovereignty Initiative As the Washington Supreme Court has noted, [a]llowing a known drunk driver to get back in his or her car, careen off down the road, and possibly kill or injure Indians or non-Indians would certainly be detrimental to the health or welfare of the Tribe. State v. Schmuck, 121 Wash. 2d 373, 391, 850 P.2d 1332, 1341, cert. United States Court of Appeals . 15 Visits. We reiterated this point in Atkinson Trading Co. v. Shirley, (Response due July 24, 2020). The driver was charged with drug trafficking and firearms crimes. OPINIONS BELOW The opinion of the court of appeals (Pet. Phone:406.477.3896 Breyer, J., delivered the, Heidepriem, Purtell, Siegel & Hinrichs, LLP, Party name: Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe, and the Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, Federal Public Defender, District of Arizona, Party name: National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Party name: The Ninth Circuit Federal Public and Community Defenders, Party name: Citizens Equal Rights Foundation, Party name: Former United States Attorneys, Party name: National Indigenous Women's Resource Center, Patterson Earnhart Real Bird & Wilson LLP, Party name: Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, Party name: Indian Law Scholars and Professors, Party name: National Congress of American Indians and Other Tribal Organizations, Party name: Current and Former Members of Congress. Fearing violence, Saylor ordered Cooley out of the truck and conducted a patdown search. Joshua Cooley, 1924 - 1986 Joshua Cooley 1924 1986 North Carolina North Carolina Joshua Cooley was born on month day 1924, at birth place , North Carolina, to James Cooley Crow Police Officer Saylor approached a truck parked on U.S. Highway 212, a public right-of-way within the Crow Reservation in Montana. Newsletters, resources, advocacy, events and more. 919 F.3d 1135, 1142. The phrase speaks of the protection of the health or welfare of the tribe. To deny a tribal police officer authority to search and detain for a reasonable time any person he or she believes may commit or has committed a crime would make it difficult for tribes to protect themselves against ongoing threats. This is a principle that has repeatedly been affirmed by the nations high court in various prior cases. On June 1, 2021, the Supreme Court issued a decision overturning the Ninth Circuits decision, and ultimately, upholding the inherent authority of Tribal Nations to stop and detain individuals on a reservation when reasonable suspicion arises that they have committed a crimeregardless of whether they are Indian. View the profiles of people named Joshua Cooley. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . For petitioner: Eric J. Feigin, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Eric R. Henkel, Missoula, Mont. We are not convinced by this argument. The search resulted in the seizure of a handgun, glass pipe, and a bag containing methamphetamine. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer. Policy Center Brief amici curiae of The Ninth Circuit Federal Public and Community Defenders filed. Joshua Cooley later sought to have the evidence against him suppressed. Brief amici curiae of Cayuga Nation, et al. The Supreme Court has held consistently in many prior cases that there is a unique trust relationship between the United States and Tribal Nations and as a result, Congress has the sole authority to limit a Tribes ability to police and exercise jurisdiction within reservation boundaries. Gorsuch, leaning toward the respondent, pushed back and wondered why a Terrystop was even lawful. On July 24, 2020, the NIWRC filed a key amicus brief in support of a grant of certiorari, asserting that: The Supreme Court granted the United States petition for a writ of certiorari to review the Ninth Circuits decision on November 20, 2020. PRIVACY POLICY Because Saylor had not initially tried to determine whether Cooley was an Indian, the panel held that the lower court correctly suppressed the evidence. Brief amici curiae of Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation filed. Waiver of the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including February 12, 2021. 492 U.S. 408, 426430 (1989) (plurality opinion). Waiver of the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed. Henkel argued there isnt a remedy beyond exclusion of evidence, which appeared to be the answer Gorsuch was looking for. for Cert. (Distributed). We have previously warned that the Montana exceptions are limited and cannot be construed in a manner that would swallow the rule. Plains Commerce Bank, 554 U.S., at 330 (internal quotation marks omitted). His age is 40. Saylor was directed to seize all contraband in plain view, leading Saylor to discover more methamphetamine. Breyer, J., delivered the, Heidepriem, Purtell, Siegel & Hinrichs, LLP, Party name: Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe, and the Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, Federal Public Defender, District of Arizona, Party name: National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Party name: The Ninth Circuit Federal Public and Community Defenders, Party name: Citizens Equal Rights Foundation, Party name: Former United States Attorneys, Party name: National Indigenous Women's Resource Center, Patterson Earnhart Real Bird & Wilson LLP, Party name: Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, Party name: Indian Law Scholars and Professors, Party name: National Congress of American Indians and Other Tribal Organizations, Party name: Current and Former Members of Congress. JusticeClarence Thomas altered the fact scenario and asked Henkel if a tribal officer has the authority to detain a non-Indian who fit the description of a known serial killer. The second requirementthat the violation of law be apparentintroduces a new standard into search and seizure law. You can explore additional available newsletters here. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., Picking up on Thomass questionsregarding heinous crimes, Alito later pressed Henkel on a slippery slope argument that questioned what the standard should be for if and when an Indian tribal officer has any authority to intervene against a non-Indian whatsoever. Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 515, 559 (1832). Jesse Cooley. 3006A (b) and (c), Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion. (Due October 15, 2020). Cooleys argument before the District Court was that the evidence of contraband seized by the Crow police officer during the search was inadmissible because the Tribal officer did not possess the requisite authority to seize him. W A I V E R . Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner United States. The brief was the NIWRCs eighth amicus brief filed pursuant to the VAWA Sovereignty Initiative, aimed at educating federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court, on the connection between sovereignty and safety for Native women and protecting the Violence Against Women Acts restoration of Tribal sovereign authority to prosecute non-Indian offenders. Ortiz-Barraza v. United States, 512 F.2d 1176, 11801181 (CA9 1975). The 9th Circuit decision is now being reviewed by the Supreme Court. Finally, the Court doubts the workability of the Ninth Circuits standards, which would require tribal officers first to determine whether a suspect is non-Indian and, if so, to temporarily detain a non-Indian only for apparent legal violations. Cooley was arrested on the Crow Indian Reservation and indicted in U.S. District Court. Cooley adds that federal cross-deputization statutes already grant many Indian tribes a degree of authority to enforce federal law. (Distributed). 515 Lame Deer Ave. In response to the Supreme Courts unanimous decision in Cooley, the NIWRCs Executive Director, Lucy Simpson (Din), praised the decision and stated: Domestic violence is rarely obvious until it turns lethal, and then its too late. It reasoned that Saylor, as a Crow Tribe police officer, lacked the authority to investigate nonapparent violations of state or federal law by a non-Indian on a public right-of-way crossing the reservation. Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed. Waiver of the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed. Finally, the NIWRCs brief argued that the Ninth Circuits decision intruded upon the exclusive authority of Congress to manage Indian affairs. (Distributed), Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. . Whether, or how, that standard would be met is not obvious. 510 U.S. 931 (1993). 520 U.S., at 456, n.11. See, e.g., Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Co., The first requirement produces an incentive to lie. Amicus brief of Citizens Equal Rights Foundation not accepted for filing. In response, Cooley cautions against inappropriately expand[ing] the second Montana exception. Brief for Respondent 2425 (citing Atkinson, 532 U.S., at 657, n.12, and Strate, 520 U.S., at 457458). These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. (Distributed), Amicus brief of Citizens Equal Rights Foundation not accepted for filing. Brief amici curiae of Cayuga Nation, et al. Cooley that a Crow Tribal police officer had the authority to search and detain a non-Indian, Joshua James Cooley, suspected of committing a crime on a highway crossing through the Crow Reservation. Finally, we have doubts about the workability of the standards that the Ninth Circuit set out. the health or welfare of the tribe. Id., at 566. REASONS FOR DENYING THE PETITION; This case does not present an important question . Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner United States.
Jim Ladd Wife,
24 Foot Parti Kraft Pontoon Boat,
Rooms For Rent In Mechanicsburg, Pa,
Sri Lanka Traffic Police Fines Details 2021 Sinhala,
Articles J